Grok 4.6 API Pricing
xAI lists Grok 4.6 at $2 input and $6 output per million tokens below the long-context threshold, then doubles those rates for prompts above 200K tokens.
Setup guides, model comparisons, and cost notes for developers building with coding agents — one key for Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok.
xAI lists Grok 4.6 at $2 input and $6 output per million tokens below the long-context threshold, then doubles those rates for prompts above 200K tokens.
DeepSeek's experimental multimodal API model adds image input to V4-Flash at the same price tier. Here is what it can do, what it costs, and where the limits are.
Read articleEnter the URL, API key, and model name in the order shown, then verify the complete connection.
Read articleUse Claude Code when the deliverable is a tested repository change; use Cowork when the deliverable is a document, spreadsheet, research result, or organized set of files.
Read articleStart with Haiku for bounded Claude-native agent work and Luna for the lowest-cost GPT-5.6 throughput, then keep the model that passes the same acceptance check.
Read articleDeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.66 input and $1.98 output per million tokens off-peak, or $1.32 input and $3.96 output during two daily UTC peak windows.
Read articleOpenAI has the cheaper low-cost tier; Claude has lower output rates in the matched daily and frontier pairs, while long-context rules can matter more than either headline.
Read articleStart with Sonnet 5 for Claude-native, tool-heavy repository work; start with Terra for Codex, Responses, and the lower current OmniaKey rate.
Read articleDeepSeek Harness is a plugin-first coding agent; this guide explains it, installs the Web UI, and connects it to OmniAKey with a verified custom-provider configuration.
Read articleGLM-5.3 keeps the GLM-5.2 base model but changes the coding decision through stronger post-training, new effort controls, and a breaking thinking-mode migration.
Read articleTest Fable 5 first for the hardest long-horizon agent work; start with GPT-5.6 Sol when Codex, Responses, and the OpenAI tool stack define the workflow.
Read articleAnthropic lists Fable 5 at $10 input, $1 cache read, and $50 output per million tokens. OmniaKey currently lists $2, $0.20, and $10 respectively.
Read articleConnect Cline to an OpenAI-compatible API in four fields, verify it, and diagnose failures by layer.
Read articleChoose a subscription for a recurring allowance and hosted features, or API billing when you need metered usage, explicit model costs, and project-level spend control.
Read articleZ.ai lists GLM-5.2 at $1.40 input, $0.26 cached input, and $4.40 output per million tokens. OmniaKey currently charges 50% of those rates.
Read articleThe biggest savings usually come from shrinking repeated context and preventing rework, not from asking for a shorter final answer.
Read articleClaude Code's local terminal can use API billing instead of a monthly Claude plan. You still pay for model usage; the difference is how authentication and billing work.
Read articleStart with Sol for difficult open-ended work, Terra for everyday coding, and Luna for clear repeatable tasks where speed and cost matter most.
Read articleChoose Opus 5 when ambiguous, long-horizon repository work rewards deeper investigation; choose GPT-5.6 Sol when you want the GPT-5.6 frontier model and its Responses-native tool stack.
Read articleUse Sonnet 5 for routine repository work and move to Opus 5 when ambiguity, architectural scope, or the cost of a wrong answer outweighs the higher token rate.
Read articleFree users cannot bypass Cursor's limit with a third-party API key. Pro users can choose Cursor on-demand, upgrade, or bring a prepaid OmniaKey key for supported chat models.
Read articleChoose Sonnet 5 for daily coding, escalate complex work to Opus 5, use Haiku 4.5 for narrow support tasks, and reserve Fable 5 for problems the others cannot finish.
Read articleThe meaningful upgrade is 30-second storytelling and production control, not the unverified 4K headlines circulating around it.
Read articleChoose the agent whose model family and execution workflow fit your team, then test both on the same repository tasks.
Read articleOpus 5 is the best-value Claude for difficult, long-running agent work, but Sonnet 5 still wins on routine cost.
Read articleMatch the error first, then test model access, the API, and Codex separately.
Read articleA practical OpenRouter alternative comparison for developers who mainly need Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok in coding agents.
Read articleMultipliers, group rates, and shared account pools make most gateway bills impossible to reconcile. What to look for, and why per-token billing you can audit is the real fix.
Read articleThere's no single best coding model — Claude, GPT, and Gemini each win a different axis. How they compare on tool use, context, and cost, and why routing beats picking just one.
Read articlePoint Nous Research's Hermes Agent at OmniaKey with one custom endpoint — `hermes model` or a few lines of config.yaml, and Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok all answer to one key.
Read articleAdd OmniaKey to OpenClaw as one OpenAI-compatible provider and run Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok by model id — including the allowlist step everyone misses.
Read articlePoint Claude Code at OmniaKey's Anthropic-native endpoint — two environment variables, Claude models that are never silently swapped, billing per token with no monthly plan.
Read articleUse the docs for copy-paste API base URLs, SDK examples, and coding-agent configuration.